Without Employers…there is No Paid Sick Leave

Oregon has consistently not been the most business friendly state.  And in light of the current bills being set forth before our legislature today seems to be no different, even more business unfriendly I would dare say.  Friday I showed a photo of me testifying in front of House Business and Labor Committee and Senate Workforce Committee about a bill that would mandate employers of all sizes to provide paid sick leave for all employees who are full time.

While at face value this doesn’t look like that bad of a bill, from my perspective not just as an employer but also as a seasonal employer this actually in the end becomes a larger problem for me.  Let me start off by saying that our farm already provides paid sick leave to our full time workers.  We do this as a part of a benefits package.  One that helps us retain employees longer, it is done on our own terms and is something that fits well within our business plan.  Actually while I was listening to testimony of many employers who were against this bill I heard the same sentiments over and over again.  They provided paid sick leave to their employees, or they gave them the choice of paid sick leave or a bonus, time and time again they said that their own employees didn’t want paid sick leave, they would rather take the bonus.  The theme was clear, every business was different and every business did what worked well for them and for their employees.

Their definition of full time work was also a large issue because it was set at only 30 hours a week.  I’m not sure when full time became only 30 hours a week, but this would cause big issues for agriculture.  We have many seasonal workers, workers that would from day one start to accrue hours of sick leave.  Keeping track of all of the regulations this bill entails and requirements would be a large headache to say the least for me.  As I said in my testimony, “I personally am the payroll person, HR person, manager, tractor driver, combine driver, you get the jest; I don’t have to time or the resources to be adding to my work load by keeping track of all employees as they come on and off this farm continuously throughout the year.”

I think what a lot of this comes down to is the fact that this legislative session we are not only looking at a huge increase in minimum wage, an increase that is large enough it won’t help start up job growth.  I think it will hinder businesses from continuing to hire.  As Tina Kotek herself even said when discussing this issue during Oregon Farm Bureau legislative day that Oregon doesn’t have enough middle level jobs and that continues to cause an issue.  Well it looks to me like they are falsely creating “middle level” income jobs by raising the minimum wage.  Minimum wage was meant to be just that, a minimum, not a living wage.

A few other examples of non business friendly legislation this session include flexible work schedule, and leave for parents to go to kids activities.  I truly believe however that working from the bottom up, making businesses more successful will create a continual industry that provides benefits that work with their business, their employees, and their overall success.  We have to be more business friendly, we have to work with employers because in the end the more you hit us, the less we can give out.  If this mandate comes down to me as an employer to provide 56 hours of sick paid leave to all employees on my farm.  I can honestly say that not only will that decrease my ability to make a benefits package that works with my business, but it will also mandate me right out of providing the benefits that I do already for my employees.  It will be possible to mandate us all right out of business, and when that happens I can tell you that even a $15 minimum wage will not make anyone any money if there is no one to hire them.

I know that we do have a lot of good people working for us in the Capitol everyday.  I just hope that we can look for some type of compromise that won’t hurt all businesses, especially agriculture in this state.  Oregon agriculture provides jobs for 1 in every 8 employees, while we may not have a big voice considering we only make up 3% of the population, we have to have a loud voice on these issues.  Because in the end we will feel the implications of bad legislation the fastest and the hardest.  As John F. Kennedy once said, “The farmer is the only man in our economy who buys everything at retail, sells everything at wholesale, and pays the freight both ways.”  We have no one to pass on the cost, we are at the end of the line.

Testifying on Paid Sick Leave

The legislature this session so far isn’t exactly employer friendly or small business friendly. So when certain bills are coming up it has been more important than ever to stand up for both agriculture and small business.

So last Monday, I along with other farmers did just that and testified against the mandatory paid sick leave for all employees.

IMG_0001
I will write more about my testimony on Mondays blog but just wanted to show a photo for Friday of me doing a little advocating for my farm here in Oregon. It’s important to show up, it does make a difference!

Local Issues with Larger Repercussions?

This past fall I testified on behalf of a measure at the Oregon State legislature that would distinguish legislative control over what farmers in Oregon can and cannot grow be left at the state level.  The reasoning behind the need for seed pre-emption is a lengthy one but comes down in the most simplest terms that there were a few counties who were trying to ban the growing of GMO crops.  They were trying to put the burden of enforcement on county governments, who can’t afford the costs that this would bring.  But beyond that, they were taking away farmer’s rights to use technology that has been deemed safe time and time again.

The measure was passed in a special session package that was signed into law last fall.  The only exception was Jackson county, who had already gotten the signatures required to get a ban on growing GMO crops on their ballot this spring.  Here in lies the local issue, a local issue that if passed would not only hurt the county where it passes, it also hurts the farmers who are trying their best and growing safe food for the world while limiting their options for what to grow.  Plus this could bring statewide changes, and that is something that as a farmer I don’t want to see.

Photo courtesy of Protect Oregon Farmers https://www.facebook.com/ProtectOregonFarmers
Photo courtesy of Protect Oregon Farmers https://www.facebook.com/ProtectOregonFarmers

But the main reason that I bring up this issue is the part that makes me the most frustrated…it’s pitting farmer against farmer.  I have heard time and time again from people I know who live in that county, “We heard that the farmers are for this measure.”  The truth is that only one part of the farming industry is behind this measure, the ones who are out to destroy conventional farmers who have also been in the area for generations making their living off the land.  There is room in agriculture for all types of farmers and it’s going to take ALL OF US to feed this world into the future.  So without trying to sound too cliche, why can’t we all just get along?  Why can’t we work together with our neighbors and figure out how to all coexsits?

I think that this is an issue that won’t be going away soon.  With labeling being a huge conversation in the talk of GMO at all levels of government, not to mention state initiatives that are being put on ballots across the country state by state.  But let’s not all lose sight of the fact that farmers are out there working their butts off to feed their family, their employee’s families, and people all over the world.  So why would we want to limit our ability to do just that by breaking up regulations on a county by county level, or even as a state by state ruling?

You can see what efforts are being made right now by checking out the No on Measure 15-119 facebook page.