I usually don’t post twice a day, but the expection is that I know my sister deserves her own blog for her birthday…so here’s the second (less important 🙂 blog for the day!
Senate Bill 633 is a seed preemption bill. We are trying to allow all regulation in relation to growing seed in Oregon to be considered an issue of statewide importance and only be regulated at the State or Federal level, not locally or at the county level. This started because of a county group that is trying to ban the growing of GMO’s in their county. My friend Marie wrote a great blog about why this has come about and included why she testified at the hearing on her blog Oregon Green.
I also testified last week and wanted to include my testimony. There were a lot of experts who came to say their piece about why they did or didn’t want this to go into effect, but for me I tried to really bring it back to my story, and why I’m here farming and how this could really help our future of farmers here in Oregon. So enjoy!
March 12, 2013
Re: Senate Bill 633
Dear Senate Committee on Rural Communities & Economic Development,
My name is Brenda Kirsch and I am a third generation farmer in St. Paul Oregon. I have been farming with my family for the past seven years, and look forward to continuing on with this legacy. We grow perennial ryegrass, hazelnuts, vegetables, wheat and clover on our 1000 acre farm.
I’m writing today in great support for Senate Bill 633, the seed preemption bill. This bill if passed would allow me as a young farmer the security of knowing that the regulation of crops would be only at the state and federal level; an assurance that would go a long ways in securing the future of our farms here in Oregon.
If we begin to have local government setting regulations this would very quickly create a nightmare for me as a producer. We farm in different towns and on borders of other counties, and our pollen doesn’t stop at the county line no matter how much you think that might happen. Can you imagine being regulated on what you can grow in one town and not the same in another? In the area that I live specifically, we farm on the border of 3 towns. One of our farms is actually on two different tax lots, in two different towns. It would be a logistical disaster and not just for me as a farmer, but also for manufacturers, and distributors as well! Beyond that our over 400 local city governments and 36 counties would feel the financial stress of taking care of these incredibly large, complex, and scientific issues that would come before them. I know that my small town of St. Paul, population 322, does not have near the resources to be making decisions based on what crops we can and cannot grow there!
Federally we already have in place the USDA, EPA, and FDA to regulate for example genetically engineered crops. While on the state side we have the ODA to do their due diligence in working with state specific situations. These are funded departments that have the expertise, financial backing and research to take on these large issues!
In a recent survey done by the American Farm Bureau Young Farmers and Ranchers it was shown that the second highest concern for young farmers today was burdensome government regulations and “red tape.” When I filled out that survey, I put that as my number one concern because I know that the potential for future regulation at even lower level of governments is out there and to me that is very scary. To be honest coming back to the farm, I had no idea how hard I would have to fight to continue farming in Oregon. Because of this I am a very active member in many groups locally and statewide. After three generations my family is here to stay, and obviously we can’t move the land that we have worked for decades, and because of that I’m ready to take on the challenge of allowing us to continue growing crops. I also see bills like 633 as a positive move toward a little more security for my family’s farm and our future here in Oregon.
This is just one way that you can be proactive legislatively and show your support for agriculture in Oregon. So please pass SB 633, don’t cut the legs out from under any of our federal and state regulators and pass the buck to counties and cities who are unprepared for these issues.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Brenda Kirsch
At the end of the hearing, a few people who were testifying on the other side of the issue approached Marie and myself and asked us why we would want to ever give up our rights at the local level?! We assured them that this…again…is an issue that is too big for counties or towns to make decisions on. What I wish I would have asked them is why they were ok with banning GMO’s in their county and taking the right for farmers to grow GMO crops in their county away? I guess the struggle to protect our farming here in Oregon goes on and on….
NuttyGrass 
I think you do not realize GMO Crops under perform, cause cancer, gluten intolerance and death. Here is one of many stories about it : http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-57517377-10391704/study-says-genetically-modified-corn-causes-tumors-but-other-scientists-skeptical-about-research/
In addition to that, here is a more scientific article which shows transgenic DNA has escaped from the plants and is effecting bacteria in the rivers, changing the bacteria. You cannot contain these crops from doing damage to the environment.
http://climate-connections.org/2013/03/25/transgenic-dna-from-gmos-in-chinese-rivers-why-is-it-suddenly-there/
I’m sorry, but if you are truly passionate about providing food, you may want to rethink your strategy instead of continuing to pass on poisons to the general public.
LikeLike
Thank you for your response on my blog with your views of GMO. I first want to say that I don’t believe I’m “passing on poisons to the general public” and I don’t think that is what any farmer is doing. Although I don’t grow any gmo crops, there are only 8 out there and I don’t currently grow any of them, I do know farmers that do grow them, and believe me the ability for these crops to under perform is not an issue. The first study you sited is interesting, but only at first glance. Seeing as it’s not a replicated study (there have actually been no replicated studies done ever. Beyond that is, the thousands and thousands of meals eaten with GMO products in them and no true link scientifically that they are the causing any sort of harm.) Is GMO something that we need to continue to work on, continue to test and improve? Yes absolutely, like technology in any industry tests and trials are important. But right now, even your article quoted…
“Numerous peer-reviewed scientific studies performed on biotech crops to date, including more than a hundred feeding studies, have continuously confirmed their safety, as reflected in the respective safety assessments by regulatory authorities around the world,” Thomas Helscher, Monsanto Rep.
We are always trying to improve what we’re doing on the farm, always trying to make ourselves better stewards of the land. And yes there are technologies that we don’t use right away, we wait until they are studied relentlessly and the replicated trials are brought to us. I imagine that you will come back with a comment about me being brainwashed by Monsanto and that is why I believe what I believe. But I will say that changing a plants biology has been going on for thousands of years. Corn used to look a lot like grass when it started out thousands of years ago. Biotechnology is just another way of speeding up the process using technology that we never had before now. Just like when you take a new medicine because technology has changed and you realize that something works better. I wouldn’t hesitate when I’m sick to get the correct medicine, but would hesitate if a doctor tried to use leaches on me, times have changed!
Thanks again for stopping by…have a good day!
LikeLike
I agree with the women above. To much info showing gmo bad. I’m obsessive compulsive disorder and believe me I’ve got through more than 10 sites. How futile people can be to defend something in the sake of money making and for jobs to be available. Man made chemicals , chemicals in general, things that cause issues. Bring scientific support backing up what disagreed with women stating before instantly disagreeing please. Much appreciation if could
LikeLike